- EAN13
- 9782315019076
- Éditeur
- Max Milo Editions
- Date de publication
- 17/04/2024
- Collection
- Essais - documents
- Langue
- anglais
- Langue d'origine
- français
- Fiches UNIMARC
- S'identifier
The Intellectual Fraud of Meat-Eaters
Alan Cook, Thomas Lepeltier
Max Milo Editions
Essais - documents
Livre numérique
"To be a vegetarian when you can eat meat is to deny the animal in you." "To
slaughter an animal, you have to love animals"! "When living beings start to
eat stones, the problem [of meat] will no longer be an issue." These are some
quotes from philosophers and intellectuals that defy logic and encourage
cruelty. Instead of recognizing that we should not cause suffering and kill
sentient beings just for our pleasure, these intellectuals justify the
consumption of animal products. They support a society that slaughters
millions of animals daily because it does not want to change its eating
habits. This book enumerates and denounces all the arguments developed by
carnivores so that this great massacre can stop and a constructive debate on
the place of animals in society can finally begin. Through books, articles and
television appearances, experts and journalists criticize, denounce and mock
the defenders of animals. This is not without consequences. Nowadays, few
people remain insensitive to the fate of livestock. When a film is shot inside
a slaughterhouse and broadcast in the media, most people are shocked. Then,
confronted with the arguments of vegans and vegetarians, they look for
answers. What to think? What to do? What to eat? And then these intellectuals
come along and tell them that vegans and vegetarians are wrong. Each time, the
basic ethical principle that we should not cause suffering and kill a sentient
being just for our own pleasure is forgotten or misinterpreted. Instead, these
intellectuals advance arguments that defy logic, have no rational basis, and
encourage cruelty. But in so doing, they reinforce a society that
unnecessarily kills a staggering number of animals because it does not want to
change its eating habits. This book takes the position of denouncing them loud
and clear; not for the pleasure of criticizing, but in the hope that this
clarification will contribute to stopping the great massacre of livestock and
serve to launch a constructive debate on their place in society.
slaughter an animal, you have to love animals"! "When living beings start to
eat stones, the problem [of meat] will no longer be an issue." These are some
quotes from philosophers and intellectuals that defy logic and encourage
cruelty. Instead of recognizing that we should not cause suffering and kill
sentient beings just for our pleasure, these intellectuals justify the
consumption of animal products. They support a society that slaughters
millions of animals daily because it does not want to change its eating
habits. This book enumerates and denounces all the arguments developed by
carnivores so that this great massacre can stop and a constructive debate on
the place of animals in society can finally begin. Through books, articles and
television appearances, experts and journalists criticize, denounce and mock
the defenders of animals. This is not without consequences. Nowadays, few
people remain insensitive to the fate of livestock. When a film is shot inside
a slaughterhouse and broadcast in the media, most people are shocked. Then,
confronted with the arguments of vegans and vegetarians, they look for
answers. What to think? What to do? What to eat? And then these intellectuals
come along and tell them that vegans and vegetarians are wrong. Each time, the
basic ethical principle that we should not cause suffering and kill a sentient
being just for our own pleasure is forgotten or misinterpreted. Instead, these
intellectuals advance arguments that defy logic, have no rational basis, and
encourage cruelty. But in so doing, they reinforce a society that
unnecessarily kills a staggering number of animals because it does not want to
change its eating habits. This book takes the position of denouncing them loud
and clear; not for the pleasure of criticizing, but in the hope that this
clarification will contribute to stopping the great massacre of livestock and
serve to launch a constructive debate on their place in society.
S'identifier pour envoyer des commentaires.